Legal Opinion

Kotal v. Goldberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1953No. Appeal, 26Published

1Opinion of the Court

375 Pa. 397 (1953)

Kotal, Admr.,

v.

Goldberg, Admrx., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 27, 1953.

November 24, 1953.

Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.

Henry C. Kessler, Jr., with him William C. Schultz, Jr., Luria & Still, Charles H. Still, William A. Luria and Raymond R. Smith, for appellant.

Joseph Rothbard, with him Clarence M. Lawyer, Jr., and Rothbard & Rothbard, for appellee

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE MUSMANNO, November 24, 1953:

The Pennsylvania Turnpike is renowned throughout the nation for its excellent construction, spacious dimensions,…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Conroy v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API