Legal Opinion
Pere Marquette R. v. Bradford
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan
Decided April 4, 1906No. 1589PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
LURTON, Circuit Judge.
The complainant, a railroad corporation of the state of Michigan, filed this bill to obtain the rescission of a contract under which the corporation purchased the entire capital stock of the Chicago, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad Company, a railroad corporation of the states of Ohio and Indiana, from the defendant Wm. A. Bradford, Jr., and to cancel an issue of collateral trust bonds, aggregating $3,500,000, issued to said Bradford in payment for said stock. It is averred that 1,115 of these bonds are now held by the defendants Kleybolte and the remainder by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Stewart v. LansingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Wyman v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bigelow v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1907
- United States v. Railway Employes' DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1923
- Thompson v. BalkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- National Tube Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1918