Legal Opinion
United States v. Hammonds
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 4, 2004No. 03-7081PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The issue before us in this case is whether the district court erred in revoking the defendant-appellant’s term of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(1), which mandates revocation for “possession” of a controlled substance, based on a single positive urinalysis result. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s revocation order.
BACKGROUND
On March 23, 1999, Tilman Eugene Hammonds pled guilty to a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and was sentenced, on July 13, 1999, to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re David L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Theophilus BlackstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Clarence TrotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Christopher Alan AlmandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. LonjoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MetzenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. John BrookerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.