Legal Opinion
Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 7, 2005No. 01-3875PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUHRHEINRICH, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BOGGS, C.J., BATCHELDER, GILMAN, GIBBONS, ROGERS, and SUTTON, JJ., joined. COLE, J. (pp. 357-59), delivered a separate concurring opinion, in which DAUGHTREY, J., joined, and ROGERS, J. (p. 359-60), delivered a separate concurring opinion. MARTIN, J. (pp. 360-68), delivered a separate dissenting opinion, in which MOORE and CLAY, JJ., joined.
OPINION
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
Ohio Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(B) allows defendants to “reopen an appeal” on the basis of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Davis v. LaflerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Clinton Folkes v. Warden NelsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Scott M. Smith v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Getsy v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.