Legal Opinion

Savelewitz v. Solid

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 18, 1958No. File 88681PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHealey, J.

Here the appellant (claimant) claimed the case for the jury docket, and the executor appellee moved to strike it off, on the ground that no jury trial is authorized in an appeal from the doings of commissioners in a solvent estate.

For many years prior to 1907 it was customary for the personal representative to represent the estate as insolvent, whether in truth that was fact or fiction, in order to have commissioners pass on claims. The fact is that if the estate was represented as solvent prior to 1907 there was no remedy by way of commissioners. In 1907 the legislature to some extent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  2. Palmer v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Slattery v. WoodinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Delehanty v. PitkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. Chamberlin Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ash v. Security National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  2. Goodman v. Bank of Boston ConnecticutConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API