Legal Opinion
In Re Cendant Corp. Securities Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 15, 2001No. 98-CV-1664 (WHW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
■WALLS, District Judge.
This opinion is a companion to this Court’s earlier opinion which resolved Ernst & Young (“E & Y”)’s motion to dismiss various cross-claims asserted against it by Cendant Corporation (“Cen-dant”). See In re Cendant Corp. Sec. Li tig., 189 F.Supp.2d 585 (D.N.J.2001) (the “April 16 order” or “April 16 slip op.”). Familiarity with that opinion is presumed. That opinion granted E & Y’s motion to dismiss Count VIII of the Amended Cross Claims, styled a contribution claim, but denied the remainder of the motion as to Cendant’s state law claims against E & Y, which E &…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- James Harvey Johnson v. Warden Noah Alldredge and Corrections Officer CronrathCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Bachowski v. UseryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Diamond Offshore Co. v. Survival Systems International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- STATE OF WISCONSIN INVESTMENT BD. v. RuttenbergDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
- Schmitendorf v. Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- Telquist McMillen Clare PLLC v. ClareDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021