Legal Opinion
Schmitendorf v. Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 6, 2024No. 2:22-cv-02293Unknown
1Opinion
In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas _____________ Case No. 22-cv-02293-TC-GEB _____________ BRADY SCHMITENDORF, Plaintiff v. JUICY’S VAPOR LOUNGE, INC., Defendant _____________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Juicy’s Vapor Lounge, Inc. filed a third-party complaint against EyeRate, Inc. Doc. 20. Juicy’s challenges the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation that denied its request to amend insofar as it sought to revise a negligence claim. Doc. 62 (appeal); Doc. 61 (R&R). For the following reasons, the R&R is adopted as modified below and EyeRate’s motion to dismiss is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.