Budd v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
No. 122,446 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS DONALD E. BUDD JR., Appellee, v. H. REED WALKER and REED WALKER, PA, Appellants. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Kansas law recognizes malicious prosecution as an independent tort. Generally, malicious prosecution claims are disfavored because they tend to discourage individuals from seeking redress in the courts. To guard against such claims, the elements of malicious prosecution are to be strictly construed to keep the cause of action from being wielded by wrongdoers as a threat to ward off legitimate suits. 2. To successfully litigate a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lonchar v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nelson v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Hawkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Siruta Ex Rel. Heirs at Law of Siruta v. SirutaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Linlor v. HolmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- Swender v. LamfersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024