Legal Opinion
People v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 1990No. D009545PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
Dorothy Anne Lee (Lee) appeals from her jury-tried conviction of selling methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.) Lee admitted the offense, but defended claiming she was entrapped. Lee contends the judgment should be reversed because she established entrapment as a matter of law. Lee also contends the court erroneously (1) instructed the jury about entrapment and motive; (2) admitted evidence of an uncharged offense; and (3) excluded testimony about the content of a ship’s log. We affirm. Lee did not establish entrapment as a matter of law, and the court properly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BarrazaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. RolloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. Vo Thanh ThoiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Gary Bradley v. W.A. Duncan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Evans v. Hood Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Gary Bradley v. W.A. Duncan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- People v. Vasquez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.