City of Dallas v. Ormsby
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Justice.
In seven points of error, the City of Dallas (the City) asserts the trial court erred in awarding appellees (the Ormsbys) attorney’s fees as a sanction for failing to comply with discovery requests. For reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The suit underlying the sanctions award arose from an automobile accident which occurred on a road owned and maintained by the City. Included in the theories upon which the Ormsbys sought recovery was the theory that a defect in the condition of the roadway, ie., a roadway edge dropoff, caused the accident which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Cummins v. Paisan Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Gee v. Lewisville Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jordan v. Bustamante, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- In Re Luster, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Velez v. De Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- Brewer v. Lennox Hearth Prods., LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- City of Dallas v. Ormsby, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.