Legal Opinion

Reicks v. Farmers Commodities Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 18, 1991No. 90-691PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

This appeal is from the district court’s denial of an application to vacate arbitration awards against commodity brokers, and entry of judgments on those awards. The brokers contend they were denied due process because the arbitration decision did not state the reasons for the award, the hearing was procedurally unfair and there was misconduct prejudicing its rights, and the awards were in manifest disregard of the law and unsupported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

Ardwin and Dale Reicks, father and son, conduct extensive hog operations. Though the operations are separate,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Paul LiangCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Neubrander v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Wesley Retirement Services, Inc. v. Hansen Lind Meyer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Humphreys v. Joe Johnston Law Firm, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands, Department of Education v. St. Thomas/St. John Educational Administrators' Ass'n, Local 101 ex rel. FordeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API