Legal Opinion
Larsen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 17, 2001No. 3:99CV2017 GLGPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff James R. Larsen and defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America filed cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [Doc # 31] is DENIED and defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Doc # 34] is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
This action was brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), appealing defendant’s denial of plaintiffs claim for long-term disability…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heublein, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harasz v. KatzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- E.R. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Assegai v. Bloomfield Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Morenz v. Wilson-CokerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Lego A/S v. Best-Lock Construction Toys, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.