Read v. Certain Merchandise Imported By O. G. Hempstead & Son
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the East ern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
BRADFORD, District Judge.
The only question pressed on this appeal is whether printed sheets of a scientific work devoted to orig*198inal scientific research., known as Politzer on the Ear, not bound nor stitched together, is a “book” within the meaning of paragraph 410 of the tariff act of August 27, 1894 (28 Stat. 509, 538), and as such not dutiable. That section is as follows:
' “410. Books, engravings, photographs, bound, or unbound, etchings, music, maps and charts, which shall have been printed more than twenty years at the date of importation, and all hydrographic charts, and scientific…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re HempsteadU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Pitman Publishing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Downing v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903