Legal Opinion

Read v. Certain Merchandise Imported By O. G. Hempstead & Son

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 28, 1900No. 17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the East ern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

The only question pressed on this appeal is whether printed sheets of a scientific work devoted to orig*198inal scientific research., known as Politzer on the Ear, not bound nor stitched together, is a “book” within the meaning of paragraph 410 of the tariff act of August 27, 1894 (28 Stat. 509, 538), and as such not dutiable. That section is as follows:

' “410. Books, engravings, photographs, bound, or unbound, etchings, music, maps and charts, which shall have been printed more than twenty years at the date of importation, and all hydrographic charts, and scientific…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re HempsteadU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Pitman Publishing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Downing v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API