Legal Opinion

In re Hempstead

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided August 14, 1899No. 31PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a proceeding by the United States to review the decision of the board of general appraisers reversing the action of the collector in assessing for duty certain merchandise imported by O. G-. Hempstead & Bon.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are established by the record, and are undisputed by either party. They are as follows: O. G. Hempstead & Son imported into the port of Philadelphia, on May 26, 1896, certain merchandise, consisting of printed sheets of a work entitled “A Text-Book on Diseases of the Ear and Adjacent Organs, b^' Dr. Adam Politzer.” After due entry, the merchandise in question was classified by the local appraiser, and a duty assessed thereon of 2.1 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 311 of the tariff act of August 28, 1894. The importers made protest, and appealed…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pitman Publishing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Macmillan Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
  3. Read v. Certain Merchandise Imported By O. G. Hempstead & SonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
  4. Harvard University v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. In re HempsteadU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API