Curtis v. City of Ketchum

BAKES, Justice.

Carl Curtis appeals a decision of the district court affirming denials of various subdivision plat applications by the Ketehum City Council. Curtis contends the court erred in (1) conditioning his filing of an amended complaint on payment of $10,000 in attorney fees; (2) holding that the city was not estopped from denying Garnet Street as adequate access to the proposed subdivision; (3) holding that no inverse condemnation of appellant’s property had occurred; and (4) awarding respondent attorney fees as the prevailing party. We affirm the district court.

Appellant (Curtis) is…