Legal Opinion

Curtis v. City of Ketchum

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1986No. 15699Published

1Opinion of the Court

720 P.2d 210 (1986)

111 Idaho 27

Carl CURTIS, dba Skyline Development Company, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF KETCHUM, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Respondent, and

Gerald Seiffert, Mayor of the City of Ketchum, Idaho; Josepf Koenig, Jack Corrock, Barry Luboviski and Phillip Puchner, who collectively constitute the City Council of the City of Ketchum, Idaho, as individuals and as representatives; Deborah S. Flood, Curtis Paige, Sheilah Dolsot, Guy Gilson, who collectively represent the Zoning Commission of the City of Ketchum, Idaho, as individuals and as representatives; Linda Haavik, as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bone v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Harrell v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Saviers v. RicheyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API