Hodgkins v. Mead
New York City Court
Appeal from trial term. Action by Frank B. Hodgkins against George W. Mead arid Sarah F. Mead, his wife.
1Opinion of the CourtOsborne, J.
Defendants were husband and wife. Plaintiff brought this .action to recover certain commissions, as a real-estate broker, for selling certain property belonging to Mrs. Mead, in which transaction the defendant George W. Mead acted as the agent of his wife. Both defendants answered .separately. On the trial the complaint was dismissed as to the defendant George W. Mead, and judgment was entered in his favor, granting him costs “conditionally, viz., to be offset against the judgment herein against Sarah F. Mead, and that no execution be issued for said costs of said George W. Mead.” The said…
2Cited by3 opinions
- The F. M. Orton Company v. Earl, New York County Courts1930
- Mazet v. CrowCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890
- Pickert v. WindeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1893