Legal Opinion

The F. M. Orton Company v. Earl

New York County Courts

Decided June 23, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHazard, J.

Plaintiff is in the undertaking business in the city of Rome. In that city, in May, 1929, one Charles H. Barber died. Plaintiff furnished the funeral, more or less definitely upon the order of some or all of the defendants. Defendant Earl was the fiancée of the decedent and defendant Fred E. Barber was his brother and the other defendant is the brother’s wife. Plaintiff has brought this action against all three, claiming that they definitely promised to become responsible for the furnishing of the funeral. The defendants Barber answer jointly by separate attorney from that of the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kozlowski v. . GomolskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Hodgkins v. MeadNew York City Court · 1889
  3. Dailey Bros. v. W. A. Clements Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Larin v. Gugino, New York County Courts1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API