Legal Opinion
Spaulding v. Harris
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 8, 2009No. 49A02-0810-CV-954PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Decedent Mattie Spaulding sustained a subdural hematoma shortly after receiving anticoagulation treatment from Dr. Erinn R. Harris at Wishard Memorial Hospital. Mattie's family filed this action alleging that Dr. Harris's and Wishard's negligence precipitated Mattie's brain injury. A jury found in favor of Dr. Harris and Wishard, and the Spauldings appealed. We hold that the trial court erred in excluding expert opinions that were based in part on a professional publication that reflected a legitimate accumulation of the expert's knowledge and expertise, but…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Romine v. GagleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kranda v. Houser-Norborg Medical Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mayhue v. SparkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Bixler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Estate of WagersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nasser v. St. Vincent Hospital & Health ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- David L. Kimbrough v. Ramona F. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Kimberly S. Earl and the Estate of Jerry EarlIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Techna-Fit, Inc. and Stuart Trotter v. Fluid Transfer Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ashley T. Tucker v. Michelle R. Harrison, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.