Legal Opinion

Paget v. Cordes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1929PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoBRIDE, J.

One of the principal errors alleged was the refusal of the court to require the plaintiff to elect upon which cause of action he would proceed, and presents a rather novel question to this court never passed upon as here presented.

The contention of the defendant is, that, under the testimony of plaintiff, the transaction was one complete transaction from the alleged seizure of the plaintiff, taking him before another officer of higher rank, and the final act of imprisoning him in the police jail; and the assault, if any was committed, was simply an element in a single transaction, which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hays v. Houston G. N. R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Wagner v. NagelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Plummer v. MoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  5. Harvey v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Utley v. City of IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Smith v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Forester v. Umpqua River Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API