Vick v. Henry Ford & Son
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error to review a judgment of involuntary nonsuit. For convenience the parties will be designated here as in the court below.
For some years prior to 1918 the plaintiffs had been ■ extensive dealers in Ford automobiles in the state of Oregon, with retail agencies at Salem and Eugene. In June of that year the plaintiff George Yick visited Dear-born, Mich., with a view of obtaining from the defendant Ford & Son a distributing agency for the state of Oregon for farm tractors, commonly called Fordsons. As a result of this visit Ford & Son addressed a letter…
2Cited by2 opinions
- H. Liebes & Co. v. KlengenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Bullis v. Interstate Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937