Legal Opinion
State v. Ingram
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 6, 2011No. AC 31396PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The defendant, John Ingram, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3). The defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction, (2) the court erroneously admitted dog scout and dog bite evidence without a proper foundation, (3) the court erred by failing to instruct the jury regarding dog tracking evidence and (4) prosecutorial impropriety deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. LusterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. HazardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Ingram v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- State v. HolleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- State v. IngramSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012