Legal Opinion

Crocker National Bank v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1977No. Civ. 49909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON, J.—

Introduction

Petitioner Crocker National Bank (hereinafter Crocker) is a defendant in a civil action filed in the superior court (Los Angeles Superior Court No. SOC 44418) in which the plaintiffs (Thomas J. Palmer, Inc., Lake Construction Co., Inc., Kenneth G. Walker, and Thomas J. Palmer) are the real parties in interest herein.

The underlying complaint (No. SOC 44418) of the real parties in interest sounding in breach of contract and fraud prays for money damages against all defendants except Crocker. As to defendant Crocker, it prays for a temporary restraining order,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Dynamics Corp. of America v. Citizens & Southern National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
  3. Van Reed v. People's National Bank of LebanonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Earle v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Steinmeyer v. Warner Consolidated Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garfinkle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Thomas J. Palmer, Inc. v. Turkiye is Bankasi A.S.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Rreef America Reit II Corp, YYYY v. Samsara, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API