Legal Opinion

Hewahewa v. Lalakea

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1939No. 2350PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PETERS, J.

Tliis is tin action by the payee Lily M. Hewahewa against Solomon K Lalakea and Mollie Pang Lalakea, the makers of a promissory note. The instrument is in usual negotiable form, payable upon demand. The plaintiff-payee is referred to in the record both as Lily M. and as Lily L. Hewahewa.

Two defenses Avere urged beloAV, vis., conditional delivery and failure of consideration. The trial court, jury waived, found for the defendants in the alternative upon both grounds, i.e., conditional delivery and, if delivery were not conditional, failure of consideration.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Rice v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Kennedy v. ManryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Pabst Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Automobile Sundries Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. Housing & Community Development Corporation of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Wilart Associates v. Kapiolani Plaza, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Zane v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API