Legal Opinion

Riddell v. Ewell

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1996No. 96CA0196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge KAPELKE.

In this action concerning the extent and scope of a right-of-way easement created by an express grant, defendant, Jonathan J. Ewell, d/b/a Ewell Construction, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Bruce and Martha A. Riddell and Nancy and Norval Parsell, entered upon remand from this court. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Ewell and the Parsells own property adjacent to one another. An easement for ingress and egress to the property owned by the Riddells extends for a distance of 10 feet on either side of the common boundary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Barnard v. GaumerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Hornsilver Circle, Ltd. v. TropeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Bors v. McGowanNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Jordan v. Rash, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Story v. BlyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Wisconsin Ave. Properties, Inc. v. First Church of Nazarene of VicksburgMississippi Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API