Legal Opinion
KNIGHTLY v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 2022No. 2:19-cv-00304Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAWN KNIGHTLY, ) ) 2:19-cv-00304-RJC Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Judge Robert J. Colville ) CENTIMARK CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert J. Colville, United States District Judge Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 80) filed by Defendant CentiMark Corporation (“CentiMark”). CentiMark argues that it is entitled to summary judgment in its favor with respect to each of the four claims brought against CentiMark by Plaintiff Shawn Knightly (“Knightly”) in his Complaint (ECF No.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lauren W. Ex Rel. Jean W. v. DeflaminisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Sandra L. SIMPSON Appellant, v. KAY JEWELERS, DIVISION OF STERLING, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.