Legal Opinion

In Re Houston Pipe Line Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2009No. 08-0800PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

When deciding a motion to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act, a Texas trial court applies Texas procedure, which permits discovery to be taken when it is needed before the arbitration or to permit the arbitration to be conducted in an orderly manner. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 171.086(a)(4),(6); see also Jack B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 268 (Tex.1992). At issue in this proceeding is whether the trial court abused its discretion by permitting discovery on damage calculations and other potential defendants, instead of deciding the motion to compel arbitration.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., LpTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In Re F.C. Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2011
  3. LDF Construction, Inc. v. Bryan, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  4. in Re: Readyone Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
  5. in Re: VNA, Inc. D/B/A VNA Home Healthcare of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API