First American Bank, N.A. v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentFarrell, Associate Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that when the District of Columbia government tows and impounds cars, it acts in the role of a “bailee for hire” subject to an ordinary standard of negligence. Rather than equate the government in this respect with the owner of a commercial parking lot, I would hold that in exercising the police function of enforcing the motor vehicle laws, which may include impounding cars, the District acts in a manner akin to a “gratuitous bailee” and is liable only for gross negligence.
*999The District’s obligation to tow, impound, and store vehicles…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prince v. Alabama State FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Hester O'Neill Wilson v. Charles O. Bittinger, National Metropolitan Bank of Washington, and Thedistrict of Columbia, AppellesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Matoil Service & Transport Co. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Jeffres v. Countryside Homes of Lincoln, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Ritter v. CastelliniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.