Legal Opinion

Hale v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1937No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is a Workmen’s Compensation ease arising on a petition to terminate a compensation agreement. The claimant, Charles Hale, was injured January 24, 1933, while in the course of his employment with the defendant. The claimant was paid compensation, and on September 26,1934, defendant filed a petition to terminate the compensation agreement, alleging that claimant was able to resume work on September 1, 1934.

Claimant filed an answer, denying that he had recovered from his injuries and averring that he is still totally disabled. The referee found that claimant was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consona v. R. E. Coulborn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Slemba v. Hamilton & SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Jones v. Hazle Brook Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Yednock v. Hazle Brook Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Earley v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Babcock v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Maishock v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Mahoney v. Francis Mulholland Roofing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Eckley v. RaeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API