Legal Opinion
In Re Vought
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 16, 2003No. 02SA293PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
76 P.3d 906 (2003)
In the Matter of the Application for Water Rights of Peter VOUGHT and the Stucker Mesa Domestic Pipeline Company in Delta Colorado.
Peter Vought, Applicant-Opposer-Appellant,
v.
Stucker Mesa Domestic Pipeline Company, Applicant-Opposer-Appellee, and
Division Engineer, Water Division 4, Appellee pursuant to C.A.R. 1(e).
No. 02SA293.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
June 16, 2003.
Patrick, Miller & Kropf, P.C., Kevin L. Patrick, Sara M. Dunn, Aspen, Colorado, Attorneys for Applicant-Opposer-Appellant.
Briscoe & Stanway, P.C., S. Gregg Stanway, Hotchkiss, Colorado, Attorneys for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- West Elk Ranch, L.L.C. v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colorado Ground Water Commission v. North Kiowa-Bijou Groundwater Management DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- City of Black Hawk v. City of CentralSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Richard A. Fox And Marnie B. Fox, Apps. v. Skagit County, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Colorado Ground Water Commission v. North Kiowa-Bijou Groundwater Management DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Holcomb v. Jan-Pro Cleaning Systems of Southern ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.