Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Happel v. Schmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

In their petition to the county court for the writ of mandamus, Elmer Happel and wife, the relators (respondents on this appeal), alleged that they own a farm in the town of Polk, and on February 27, 1945, applied in writing to the town board to widen a private road, which is one rod wide, on their farm and leading to their farm buildings; that on April 5, 1945, the town board ordered and determined that said application be denied; that relators appealed from said denial to County Judge Bucklin, who, after a hearing, duly appointed three commissioners to review the town board’s order and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Backhausen v. MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Thompson v. EggenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Osborn v. HartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Brock v. HishenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Morris v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moritz v. BuglewiczNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lange v. TummCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  3. Discon v. Saray, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  4. Discon v. Saray, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  5. Opinion No. Oag 9-88, (1988), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API