Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. Acrea
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Marion Circuit Court (14,357); W. W. Thornton, Judge pro torn. Action by Katherine D. Aerea against the Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. On motion to dismiss appeal as to Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company. (Por decision on merits, see — Ind. App. —.)
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
The.appellee appears specially, so far as the appellant Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company is concerned, for the sole purpose of filing her motion to dismiss the appeal of said company. The motion is based upon the following grounds: (1) That the Appellate Court has no jurisdiction of the appellee; (2)- that the appeal of said appellant was a vacation appeal, and the appellee has not received any legal notice Of said appeal, and has not entered any appearance in this cause; (3) said appellant attempted to appeal said cause in term, but failed to file any bond within the time…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. FrankelIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Goodrich v. StanglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- McKinney v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Smith v. Wells Manfg. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Ashley v. HendersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wabash Railroad v. PriddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. AcreaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Helms v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. PriddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Gates v. WeyenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.