Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Hartman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1896No. 17,698PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

This was an action by the appellant against appellee and one Bennett H. Young on an appeal bond in the Floyd Circuit Court, from whence the venue was changed to the Harrison Circuit Court. There was no service and no appearance as to Young.

Both he and appellee were sureties on the appeal bond.

The complaint was in three paragraphs, to the first and third of which a demurrer for want of sufficient facts was sustained. A demurrer for want of sufficient *225facts was overruled to the second paragraph of the appellee’s answer. The issues joined were tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hadley v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ham v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Mitchell v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. FrankelIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. WatkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Goodrich v. StanglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Penn American Plate Glass Co. v. PolingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Supreme Council of the Catholic Benevolent Legion v. BoyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API