Briggs v. Riversound Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McMURRAY, Judge.
The single issue in this case is whether a remote purchaser of a home may maintain a negligence action against the builder of the home despite a lack of contractual privity. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant and this appeal resulted. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The Plaintiffs, Dr. and Mrs. Richard M. Briggs, purchased a condominium from the Defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Edward S. Albers in April 1993. 1 Daryl Wagner Construction Co. built the home in 1989. The condominium was a part of a development by River-sound Limited…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowman v. HenardTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Cosmopolitan Homes, Inc. v. WellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- McDonough v. WhalenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Speight v. Walters Development Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Cloud Nine, LLC v. WhaleyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
- Russo v. Southern Developers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Curry v. ThornsberryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.