Legal Opinion
Bennett v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 21, 2006No. Civil Action 05-2297(RMC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hamlet C. Bennett filed a pro se Complaint against the United States (the “Government”), alleging that beginning with tax year 1995, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) “recklessly, intentionally, or by reason of negligence disregarded” various provisions of Title 26 of the U.S.Code in connection with the collection of federal tax. Compl. ¶¶ 1 & 7. This Complaint is among the scores of nearly identical pro se complaints filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia over the past year seeking a refund, damages, and injunctive…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reading v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Judd v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- American Postal Workers' Union v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Void-El v. O'BrienDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Darby v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.