Legal Opinion

Earl B. Lewis v. Texaco Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 9, 1975No. 233, Docket 75-7233PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

This is an action by 32 seamen for statutory remedies arising out of a breach of shipping articles by their employer, defendant Texaco Inc. After a non-jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Constance Baker Motley, in an opinion reported at 1975 A.M.C. 61 (S.D.N.Y.1974), awarded plaintiffs an amount equal to one month’s wages under 46 U.S.C. § 594, prejudgment interest and counsel fees, but denied claims under 46 U.S.C. § 596 for two days’ wages for each day payment was delayed. Texaco appeals. We affirm except as to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Dicky D. Voegeli and Sharon Voegeli v. Harvard R. Lewis and Methodist Hospital, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Rey Castillo, Carlos Abesamis, Lauro Malinas, Emetrio Noble, and Jerry Ramos v. Spiliada Maritime Corporation and Spiliada MvCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. National Organization for Women v. Sperry Rand Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
  5. City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API