Legal Opinion

Kentucky Fluorspar Co. v. Wolford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 24, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Rees

— Affirming.

H. D. Wolford, an employee of the Kentucky Fluorspar Company, was assaulted by a fellow workman and seriously injured. The Workmen’s Compensation Board awarded the injured employee $3 per week for 268 weeks, and the Crittenden circuit court affirmed the award. On this appeal from that judgment, the company insists that Wolford’s injury did not result from an accident arising out of his employment, and therefore is not compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Ky. Stats., sec. 4880 et seq.).

On July 20, 1933, Coley Conger, appellant’s “mill…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. January-Wood Company v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Polar Ice & Fuel Co. v. MulrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Hansen v. Frankfort Chair Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baker v. GordonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. York v. City of HazardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  3. Hudson v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Henry Vogt Machine Co. v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  5. Howard v. Dawkins Log & Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API