Legal Opinion
Ceferatti v. Boisvert
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 14, 1950No. 3343; 3395PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
These two cases involve a single transaction and identical parties. In one action the plaintiff brings suit to foreclose a mortgage for $5000 given to him by the defendants as part of the purchase price for a dwelling house and garage in Waterbury. In the other he seeks judgment upon a note for $1200 which, secured by a conditional bill of sale, was given in payment for furniture in the house. The defendants denied that they were indebted to the plaintiff and alleged by way of counterclaim in both actions that on the date of sale and prior thereto the plaintiff “falsely and fraudulently…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Barnes v. StarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Bradley v. OviattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Helming v. KashakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Laukaitis v. KliknaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Duksa v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Wedig v. BrinsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.