Legal Opinion
Second City Music, Inc., Doing Business as Second Hand Tunes v. City of Chicago, Illinois
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 27, 2003No. 02-4034PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
To prevent dealers in used merchandise from serving (wittingly or not) as fences for thieves, Chicago requires them to obtain licenses, collect information about each person from whom they purchase goods, and submit to searches on demand. Chicago Municipal Code §§ 4-264-005 to -230. The ordinance covers all dealers in “secondhand property,” a term that means any used “audio-video equipment, camera, computer hardware, jewelry made of precious metal or stone, article made of precious metal, precious stone or gem, sporting or athletic wear or equipment, including a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Virginia v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Al Otro Lado v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Stuller, Inc. v. Steak N Shake Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- James Campbell v. Frank MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Illinois One News, Inc., Doing Business as the Gift Spot v. City of Marshall, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.