Legal Opinion

Acker v. City of Durham

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided January 31, 2002No. I.C. NO. 692430Published

1Opinion of the Court

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Young and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission REVERSES the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award and enters the following Opinion and Award.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS

1. The parties are subject to and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Baker v. City of SanfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API