Legal Opinion

M'Kinney v. Springer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1847PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of indebitatus assumpsit, brought by Riley Springer, surviving partner, &c., against Joseph Ml Kinney. The declaration was filed in April, 1844. The defendant pleaded the general issue and various other pleas. The sixth plea is as follows: The defendant says actio non, because he says that the Revised Statutes of the state, passed at the 27th session of the general assembly, were received by the clerk of the Decatur Circuit Court, at his office in Greensburgh in said county, on the 6th of March, 1844 ; and that a record of the time of the receipt of said statutes was then…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ogden, Administrator of Cornell v. Blackledge, of SalterSupreme Court of the United States · 1804

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. BlodgettIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Green v. KarolIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Aaron v. City of TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1881
  5. Schoonover v. VachonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API