Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of McCulloch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 1989No. 15-80-04904; CA A48766PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Father appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify the judgment of dissolution to change custody of the party’s minor child and to eliminate child support. Mother cross-appeals from the trial court’s refusal to award her reasonable attorney fees under ORS 107.135(6). The court said that it could not consider doing so, because no right to attorney fees had been preserved. We affirm on the appeal and write only to address the cross-appeal.

In response to father’s motion and order to show cause, mother filed an affidavit that did not include a specific request for attorney fees.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State Department of Human Resources v. StrasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Heidtke v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. In re the Marriage of SeeverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API