Stevens Chevrolet, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
This case presents a sorry picture of bureaucratic bungling and administrative intransigence. It has been pending for nine and a half years. Because of the stubborn refusal of the Commission on Human Rights to correct an obvious procedural error, at least six of those years have been wasted, and the case is no closer to a final disposition now than it was in 1979. We reverse the order that is before us for review and remand the case for a de novo evidentiary hearing before a new hearing examiner. In light of the delay thus far, we direct that the new hearing be held…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Investment Company Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Wisconsin Avenue Nursing Home v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Harris v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- American University v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.