Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2011No. 28A05-1011-CR-704PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Wayne K. Smith (Smith), appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence.

We affirm.

*654 ISSUE

Smith raises three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as the following single issue: Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to suppress evidence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 3, 2009, Detective Joshua Goodman (Detective Goodman) with the Linton Police Department was contacted by Indiana Conservation Officer Tom La-hay (Officer Lahay) in reference to an ongoing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Houser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. QuirkIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dora v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Robert Bowen v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Travis L. Chizum v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API