Dora v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Defendant, John Dora (Dora), appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence.
We affirm.
ISSUE
Dora raises two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as the following single issue: Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to suppress evidence.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 26, 2009, a party celebrating Michael Shearer’s (Shearer) birthday was held on Dora’s property in Brown County. Dora’s property is essentially an isolated clearing in the woods. Access to the property…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pirtle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Holder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. StruckmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adam Miller v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Adam Miller v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Brian Keith Petro v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
- Carlos Barrientos v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Francis Napier v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.