Legal Opinion

Widner Electric & Industrial, Inc. v. Lee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum due on an account for the repair of a water pump which it had previously sold to defendant. Defendant filed his second amended answer, generally denying the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint and affir matively alleging a separate defense and counterclaim. On May 14, 1974, the day trial began, plaintiff filed a demurrer to defendant’s separate affirmative defense and counterclaim and its reply which included a general denial and affirmative defense to the defendant’s counterclaim.

The case was tried to a jury and after both parties rested,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Perkins v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. CROSS ET UX v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Wasserburger v. American Scientific Chemical, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Winters v. BisaillonOregon Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Kaiser Gypsum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wood v. WoodcockOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Riviera Motors, Inc. v. HigbeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Burklund v. ClaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Vandehey v. Munger Bros., LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API