Legal Opinion

Karbal v. Arizona Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 24, 2007No. 1 CA-TX 06-0010PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 Steven Karbal (“Karbal”) appeals the dismissal of his refund claim because the tax court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Beginning March 1, 2001, Arizona imposed a transaction privilege tax on car and hotel room rentals pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) sections 5-839 and 5-840 to fund projects sponsored by the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority (“AZ-STA”). See, e.g., Long v. Napolitano, 203 Ariz. 247, 252, ¶7, 53 P.3d 172, 177 (App. 2002) (discussing taxes collected to fund…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. OkunCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. CCI Europe, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Saban v. AdorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Arizona City Sanitary District v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API