Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Moore v. Sanders

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1981No. 80-1418PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant sets forth the following propositions of law: (1) that delay in asserting a right does not of itself constitute laches where a deputy, who is unlawfully removed by the sheriff, brings an action for reinstatement shortly after learning of his rights as a classified civil servant and where the sheriff has not been materially prejudiced by the delay, and (2) that an action by a classified civil servant whose removal was contrary to R. C. 124.34 is governed by the six-year statute of limitations in R. C. 2305.07 and not by the doctrine of laches where the delay in question was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stoer v. RaschigOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. WitterOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Sheets v. City of PortsmouthOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. North Olmsted Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1267 v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Carver v. HullOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Cater v. N. OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API