Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. New Hampshire Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1999No. 98-518 and 98-521PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶ 1 These combined claims were filed in the Montana Workers’ Compensation Court by Doug Lockhart and Nancy Petak in part to recover attorney fees from medical benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Court, however, found that medical benefits payable to a claimant are not subject to an attorney fee lien and that the fee must be paid by the claimants out of other funds.

¶2 The issue raised on appeal is whether the attorney’s fee lien codified at § 37-61-420, MCA, applies to medical benefits recovered due to the efforts of the attorney in a workers’ compensation claim.

*469FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Lockhart…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carlson v. CainMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kelleher Law Office v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Billings Deaconess Hospital, Inc. v. AngelMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pinyerd v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Commercial Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. S.L.H. v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wiard v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wild v. Fregein ConstructionMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Goble v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Mathews v. BJS Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API