Legal Opinion
Pinyerd v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
Montana Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1995No. 94-474PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
The claimant, Jerry Pinyerd, filed a petition in the Workers’ Compensation Court for the State of Montana in which he sought medical and disability benefits from the State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund for injuries he alleged were sustained during the course of his employment with Prestige Toyota. After a trial, the Workers’ Compensation Court denied Pinyerd’s claim for benefits, based on its conclusion that his injury did not arise out of his employment. Pinyerd appeals this conclusion. We reverse the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court.
The following issue is presented on appeal.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Landeen v. Toole County Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
- Stordalen v. Ricci's Food FarmMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Martelli v. Anaconda-Deer Lodge CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Guarascio v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Willis v. Taylor & Fenn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wild v. Fregein ConstructionMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Peggy Troutt, Dba Little Joe's Tavern v. Colorado Western Insurance Company, Peggy Troutt, Dba Little Joe's Tavern,plaintiff-Appellant v. Colorado Western Insuran CecompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lockhart v. New Hampshire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Mathews v. BJS Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- Troutt v. Colorado Western InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.